Persistence of volatility in futures markets

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Chen, Z., Daigler, R. T. and Parhizgari, A. M. (2006) Persistence of volatility in futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 26 (6). pp. 571-594. ISSN 1096-9934 doi: 10.1002/fut.20210

Abstract/Summary

This article examines the characteristics of key measures of volatility for different types of futures contracts to provide a better foundation for modeling volatility behavior and derivative values. Particular attention is focused on analyzing how different measures of volatility affect volatility persistence relationships. Intraday realized measures of volatility are found to be more persistent than daily measures, the type of GARCH procedure used for conditional volatility analysis is critical, and realized volatility persistence is not coherent with conditional volatility persistence. Specifically, although there is a good fit between the realized and conditional volatilities, no coherence exists between their degrees of persistence, a counterintuitive finding that shows realized and conditional volatility measures are not a substitute for one another

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/22107
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/fut.20210
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar