How different are GM food accepters and rejecters really? A means-end chains application to yogurt in Germany

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Boecker, A., Hartl, J. and Nocella, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-6315 (2008) How different are GM food accepters and rejecters really? A means-end chains application to yogurt in Germany. Food Quality and Preference, 19 (4). pp. 383-394. ISSN 0950-3293 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.006

Abstract/Summary

The purpose of the paper is to identify and describe differences in cognitive structures between consumer segments with differing levels of acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food. Among a sample of 60 mothers three segments are distinguished with respect to purchase intentions for GM yogurt: non-buyers, maybe-buyers and likely-buyers. A homogeneity test for the elicited laddering data suggests merging maybe- and likely-buyers, yielding two segments termed accepters and rejecters. Still, overlap between the segments’ cognitive structures is considerable, in particular with respect to a health focus in the evaluation of perceived consequences and ambivalence in technology assessment. Distinct differences are found in the assessment of benefits offered by GM food and the importance of values driving product evaluation and thus purchase decisions.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/19103
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.006
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Uncontrolled Keywords Mean-end chain; Laddering; Values; Risk perception; Benefit perception; Genetically modified foods; Consumer acceptance
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar