Truth commissions: a barrier to the provision of judicial assistance?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bisset, A. J. R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-3827 (2010) Truth commissions: a barrier to the provision of judicial assistance? International Criminal Law Review, 10 (5). pp. 647-678. ISSN 1571-8123 doi: 10.1163/157181210X527055

Abstract/Summary

Truth commissions and criminal trials have come to be perceived as complementary transitional justice mechanisms. However, where effective prosecutions are dependent on the exchange of information and transfer of suspects between states under existing mutual legal assistance and extradition arrangements, the operation of a truth commission in the state of territoriality may act as an obstacle to international cooperation. At the same time, requests for assistance from a third state pursuing prosecutions may impact negatively on the truth commission process in the requested state by inhibiting those reluctant to become involved in criminal proceedings from offering testimony. This article demonstrates a practical discord between these bodies when they operate in different states and questions whether they can truly be considered “complementary”.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/17408
Identification Number/DOI 10.1163/157181210X527055
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Nijhoff
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar