Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: objective findings and subjective insights

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Beaman, C. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-242X (2005) Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17 (2). pp. 241-265. ISSN 0954-1446 doi: 10.1080/09541440440000023

Abstract/Summary

Two experiments examine the effects of extraneous speech and nonspeech noise on a visual short-term memory task administered to younger and older adults. Experiment 1 confirms an earlier report that playing task-irrelevant speech is no more distracting for older adults than for younger adults (Rouleau T Belleville, 1996), indicating that "irrelevant sound effects" in short-term memory operate in a different manner to recalling targets in the presence of competing speech (Tun, O'Kane, T Wingfield, 2002). Experiment 2 extends this result to nonspeech noise and demonstrates that the result cannot be ascribed to hearing difficulties amongst the older age group, although the data also show that older adults rated the noise as less annoying and uncomfortable than younger adults. Implications for theories of the irrelevant sound effect, and for cognitive ageing, are discussed.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14167
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09541440440000023
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords SHORT-TERM-MEMORY, CHANGING-STATE DISRUPTION, COLOR-WORD TEST, PHONOLOGICAL SIMILARITY, UNATTENDED SPEECH, WORKING-MEMORY, AUDITORY, DISTRACTION, SERIAL-RECALL, INTERFERENCE, INHIBITION
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar