Joint importance of multistate systems

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Wu, S. M. (2005) Joint importance of multistate systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 49 (1). pp. 63-75. ISSN 0360-8352 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2005.02.001

Abstract/Summary

Importance measures in reliability engineering are used to identify weak areas of a system and signify the roles of components in either causing or contributing to proper functioning of the system. Traditional importance measures for multistate systems mainly concern reliability importance of an individual component and seldom consider the utility performance of the systems. This paper extends the joint importance concepts of two components from the binary system case to the multistate system case. A joint structural importance and a joint reliability importance are defined on the basis of the performance utility of the system. The joint structural importance measures the relationship of two components when the reliabilities of components are not available. The joint reliability importance is inferred when the reliabilities of the components are given. The properties of the importance measures are also investigated. A case study for an offshore electrical power generation system is given.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/12459
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2005.02.001
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Construction Management and Engineering
Uncontrolled Keywords birnbaum importance, structural importance, joint structural, importance, joint reliability importance, multistate system, RELIABILITY-IMPORTANCE, MONOTONE SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar