Comparative performance of UK PFI and non-PFI hospitals

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Wang, J. (2008) Comparative performance of UK PFI and non-PFI hospitals. In: CIB 2008 Transformation through Construction, Dubai.

Abstract/Summary

Since the first PFI hospital was established in 1994, many debates centred on the value for money and risk transfer in PFIs. Little concern is shown with PFI hospitals’ performance in delivering healthcare. Exploratory research was carried out to compare PFI with non‐PFI hospital performance. Five performance indicators were analysed to compare differences between PFI and non‐PFI hospitals, namely the length of waiting, the length of stay, MRSA infection rate, C difficile infection rate and patient experience. Data was collected from various government bodies. The results show that only some indexes measuring patient experience emerge statistically significant. This leads to a conclusion that PFI hospitals may not perform better than non‐PFI hospitals but they are not worse than non‐PFI hospitals in the delivery of services. However, future research needs to pay attention to reliability and validity of data sets currently available to undertake comparison.

Item Type Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/12417
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Construction Management and Engineering
Uncontrolled Keywords PFI, procurement, hospital, healthcare service, healthcare performance
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar