Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about written feedback strategy, scope, and focus

[thumbnail of 1-1139_GuAslan_ExploringChineseEFLTeachers_02-20-25_Final.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gu, J. and Aslan, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-5493 (2025) Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about written feedback strategy, scope, and focus. Journal of Response to Writing. ISSN 2575-9809 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Effective written feedback is crucial to student learning and developing writing skills. Responding to student writing is a multifaceted and complex process that requires a more nuanced understanding of second language writing research. This study explored teachers’ beliefs and practices about written feedback, which may be influenced by a range of factors. Data were collected from four middle-school English teachers in China via stimulated recall tasks and semi-structured interviews reflecting retrospectively on how and why teachers gave feedback to student writing. Findings revealed intersections between feedback strategy and learner proficiency level; feedback scope and time constraints, including teacher workload; and feedback focus and contextual factors. Additionally, we discuss the implications of these findings in relation to teacher professional development, contextualized teacher education, and the changing landscape of written feedback practices in the age of AI.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/121792
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Publisher Brigham Young University
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar