What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Meurer, M. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5060-3709, Belitski, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-0105, Fisch, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3609-7193 and Thurik, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0242-6908 (2024) What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles. Small Business Economics, 63 (3). pp. 1139-1170. ISSN 1573-0913 doi: 10.1007/s11187-023-00865-0

Abstract/Summary

The field of entrepreneurship has seen remarkable growth, increasing the expectations of academic audiences. Articles need to balance novelty with rigorous methodology, theoretical contributions, social implications, and coherent argumentation to succeed in the publication process. However, navigating these varied and sometimes conflicting expectations to achieve optimal distinctiveness in academic narratives is challenging for authors. To explore how authors can achieve optimal distinctiveness amidst these complex expectations, we studied academic narratives and related editorial decisions of two leading entrepreneurship journals, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice (ETP, 4,151 papers) and Small Business Economics Journal (SBEJ, 4,043 papers), using computer-aided text analysis. Our study debunks common assumptions about what makes a successful entrepreneurship paper, providing an empirical basis for understanding actual versus perceived publication requisites. Furthermore, we extend optimal distinctiveness theory by demonstrating that high distinctiveness is not uniformly advantageous, meeting numerous expectations is not necessarily beneficial, and clear language is crucial for complex narratives. Our study underscores that crafting narratives is more nuanced than traditionally believed.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120595
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s11187-023-00865-0
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Digitalisation, Marketing and Entrepreneurship
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar