Simplifying Urdu: Nasta‘liq types for mechanical composition and the forces of colonisation, monopolisation, and ownership

[thumbnail of Borna Izadpanah_BookHist-2024-0008.R1_Proof_hi.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Izadpanah, B. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-4350 (2025) Simplifying Urdu: Nasta‘liq types for mechanical composition and the forces of colonisation, monopolisation, and ownership. Book History. ISSN 1529-1499 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Deeply rooted in the cultural legacy of the Mughal Empire and the Persian language in South Asia, Nasta‘liq has historically served as the preferred writing style to represent the Urdu language. Despite its aesthetic appeal, characterised by its fluidity and cascading compositions, Nasta‘liq is considered one of the most demanding forms of writing for typographic representation—a dilemma that dates back to the late sixteenth century and early European attempts to create Nasta‘liq types. This article critically engages with crucial moments in the history of Urdu Nasta‘liq type-making in the twentieth century and explores its wide-ranging implications for Urdu-speaking communities. It begins in the 1920s with an examination of the early efforts of Nizam’s Government in Hyderabad (Deccan) and proceeds to evaluate the role of British manufacturers of mechanical typesetting machines, Linotype and Monotype, in the development and dissemination of Urdu typography from the 1940s onward. By positioning the creation of Nasta‘liq type-making at the centre of broader typographic, cultural, political, and technological frameworks, this study aims to uncover the driving forces behind such typographic ventures, as well as their reception by the reading public, publishers, and of typesetting machine manufacturers.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120502
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Arts and Communication Design > Typography & Graphic Communication
Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar