Developing a conceptual framework for Global South comparisons: Colombian and South African contributions

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bilchitz, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-675X and Cachalia, R. (2023) Developing a conceptual framework for Global South comparisons: Colombian and South African contributions. In: Bilchitz, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-675X and Cachalia, R. (eds.) Transitional Justice, Distributive Justice, and Transformative Constitutionalism: Comparing Colombia and South Africa. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-30. ISBN 9780192887627 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780192887627.003.0001

Abstract/Summary

This introductory chapter develops the conceptual framework of the book which focuses on three ideas and the relationship between them: transitional justice, distributive justice, and transformative constitutionalism. It seeks to highlight the relevance and importance of these concepts to comparisons of Global South societies and then explain why this framework is particularly apposite to comparing Colombia and South Africa. This is followed by a discussion of the book’s approach to addressing the challenges of conducting Global South comparisons, which naturally leads to an explanation and justification for the specific methodology adopted in the book. That methodology involves the identification of specific themes on which authors write chapters about Colombia or South Africa and then a joint reflection on what emerges from considering the comparison between them. Finally, this chapter outlines the different segments of the book and the themes around which the chapters are organised, and provides a brief outline of the key arguments made by the authors.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120449
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/oso/9780192887627.003.0001
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar