CT vs COIN? Engaging with civilians in Afghanistan

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Toros, H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-5292 (2024) CT vs COIN? Engaging with civilians in Afghanistan. In: Harley, S. (ed.) Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Insurgency (COIN) - A NATO COE-DAT Research Project. Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism, Ankara, pp. 75-86. ISBN 9789754097818

Abstract/Summary

One of the principal distinctions between counter-terrorism (CT) and counterinsurgency (COIN) approaches is how to engage with civilians. In the CT approach, civilians may surround and even support the opponent, but they are not deemed central actors in the conflict. The conflict instead remains between the terrorists and the CT forces and the aim of the latter is to destroy the terrorists’ capability, while harming as few civilians as possible. In COIN, civilians are a central part of the conflict in which, alongside fighting, a political battle is waged to convince civilians to withdraw their support from the insurgents. The aim of this chapter is to examine how the attitudes and engagement with civilians in Afghanistan evolved over the two decades of fighting, focusing on the ‘Hearts and Minds’ logic and how it has been put into practice across political, economic, and social programs. The chapter focuses in particular on programs aimed at convincing Afghan women to support the ISAF counter-insurgency operation and assumptions made about gender in these programs. The fundamental question posed is, what have we learned from this case for future interventions?

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119775
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Publisher Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar