Horizontal inequity in the use of mental healthcare in Australia

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Black, N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-7054, Johnston, D. W. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-2890, Knapp, M., Shields, M. A. and Wong, G. H. Y. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-942X (2024) Horizontal inequity in the use of mental healthcare in Australia. Health Economics. ISSN 1099-1050 doi: 10.1002/hec.4910

Abstract/Summary

For people experiencing mental health problems, timely access to high‐quality healthcare is imperative for improving outcomes. However, limited availability of services, high out‐of‐pocket costs, insufficient health literacy and stigmatizing attitudes may mean people do not receive the necessary treatment. We analyze Australian longitudinal data to document the extent and predictors of horizontal inequity in mental healthcare use among people with a newly developed mild or moderate mental disorder. Importantly, we compare people with similar health, residing in the same area, thus controlling for differences in healthcare needs and availability of services. Results suggest that mental healthcare use is not significantly associated with household income or financial hardship. In contrast, we find significant inequities by educational attainment, with university graduates around 50% more likely to receive mental healthcare than high‐school dropouts. These findings are robust across subsamples and alternative modeling approaches, including panel data models with individual fixed‐effects. Additional explorations of the education gradient suggest a potential pathway through mental health‐specific knowledge and attitudes.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119455
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/hec.4910
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar