Defining and assessing risk analysis quality: insights from applications of the SRA risk analysis quality test

[thumbnail of JRR-submitted R1-final-UoR.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 May 2026.
Restricted to Repository staff only until 27 May 2026

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lathrop, J., Dikmen, I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-7557, Emma, S. and Terje, A. (2024) Defining and assessing risk analysis quality: insights from applications of the SRA risk analysis quality test. Journal of Risk Research, 27 (8). pp. 1028-1040. ISSN 1466-4461 doi: 10.1080/13669877.2024.2431902

Abstract/Summary

The Applied Risk Management Specialty Group of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) identified a need to define, characterize, and improve risk analysis quality, specifically its quality in supporting risk management. To address that need, they drew on prior research and experience to develop the Risk Analysis Quality Test, the RAQT, a list of 76 questions, each asking if a risk analysis satisfies an aspect of risk analysis quality. The RAQT is both a definition of risk analysis quality, and a “spotter” of shortfalls, providing a language with which to describe then address possible shortfalls. The 76 questions were compiled by a working group based on risk science knowledge and on shortfalls they had observed in practice. With this study, we demonstrate that, simply by defining an explicit process to characterize risk analysis quality, the RAQT can improve risk analysis quality on several levels. We describe applications of the RAQT at each of three levels: 1) to evaluate risk analysis reporting within a large project; 2) to critique and suggest improvements for describing risk; and 3) more strategically, as a basis for orienting an organizational culture around awareness and management of risk. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study. This paper contributes to the risk analysis body of knowledge and practice by demonstrating the critical role of risk analysis quality assessment to identify shortfalls in risk characterization and communication, and the role of organizational culture in shaping how effectively risk analyses can guide risk management.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119427
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13669877.2024.2431902
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar