Using semantic iterative keyword sampling for polyonymous concepts in interlingual educational research by example of ‘formative evaluation’ in German

Altheide, D. L. & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update. Vol. 33. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American. 284 (5), pp. 34-43. Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research. 10 (2): 141-163. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 5 (1): 7-71. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H. (ed). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 57-71). Vol. 2, Research designs. Washington (D.C.): American Psychological Association. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. 4th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In: Denzin, N. K. & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509-535). 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Clark, I. (2011). Formative Assessment: Policy, Perspectives and Practice. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy. 4 (2), pp. 158-180. Coates, D. (2022). Semantic Search: How It Works & Who It’s For. Accessed August 1, 2023. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-how-it-works-who-its-for/438960. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. 8th Ed. London: Routledge. Cookson, C. J. (2018). Assessment terms half a century in the making and unmaking: from conceptual ingenuity to definitional anarchy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43 (6), pp. 930-942. Cruse, A. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dunn, K. E. & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessment in Education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 14 (7), pp. 1-11. Gipps, C. (2012). Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. Classic Ed. London: Routledge. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Google (2023). How Google Search organizes information. Accessed November 22, 2020. https://www.google.com/search/howsearchworks/how-search-works/organizing-information. Google Search Central (2023). In-depth guide to how Google Search works. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/how-search-works. Grotlüschen, A. and F. Bonna (2008). German-language Literature Review. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Teaching, Learning and Assessment for Adults: Improving Foundation Skills (pp. 1-59). Paris: OECD Publishing. Ac-cessed August 26, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/40046802.pdf. Gübür, K. T. (2021). What is Semantic Search? How Does Semantic Search Affect SEO? Accessed August 1, 2023. https://www.holisticseo.digital/theoretical-seo/semantic-search. Guha, R., McCool, R., and Miller, E. (2003). Semantic search. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, May 20-24 (700-709). ACM Press: NY, New York. Haspelmath, M. and Sims, A. (2010). Understanding Morphology. 2nd Ed. London: Routledge. Hsieh, H. and Shannon, S. E. (2015). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9): 1277-1288. Kiger, M. E. and Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher. 42(8), 846-854. Kopp, O. (2022a). What is semantic search: A deep dive into entity-based search. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://searchengineland.com/semantic-search-entity-based-search-388221. Kopp, O. (2022b). Google MUM update: What can SEOs expect in the future? Accessed July 30, 2023. https://searchengineland.com/google-mum-update-seo-future-383551. Köller, O. (2005). Formative Assessment in Classrooms: A Review of the Empirical German Literature. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (ed). Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms (pp. 265-279). Paris: OECD Publishing. Accessed 05 October, 2018. http://www.edra.gr/pdf/9605021E.pdf Kracauer, S. (1952). The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly. 16 (4), pp. 631-642. Kromrey, H. (2001). Evaluation von Lehre und Studium – Anforderungen an Methodik und Design [Evaluation of teaching and studies – requirements for methodology and design]. In Spiel, C. (ed). Evaluation univeristärer Lehre – zwischen Qualitätsmanagement und Selbstzweck [Evaluation of university teaching – between quality management and autotelic] (pp. 21-60). Münster: Waxmann. Maier, U. (2011). Formative Leistungsmessung: Von einer Noten- zu einer Diagnosekultur [Formative performance measurement: from a culture of grades to one of diagnosis]. Schulmanagement. 3, pp. 22-24. McMillan, J. H., Hellsten, L., Kelly, I. W., Noonan, B. & Klinger, D. (2000). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. Toronto: Pearson. Middlewood, D. & Cardno, C. (eds) (2001). Managing Teacher Appraisal and Performance: A Comparative Approach. London: Routledge/Falmer. Negi, Y. S. and Kumar, S. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Keyword- and Semantic-Based Search Engines. In Mohapatra, D. P. and Patnaik, S. (eds). Intelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking, and Informatics, Raipur, June 12-14 (727-736). Springer: New Delhi. Nowell, L. S, Norris, J. M., White, D. E. & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16 (1), pp. 1-13. Online Etymology Dictionary (2023). Upgrade. Accessed 27 November, 2023. https://www.etymonline.com/word/upgrade. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Accessed 10 April, 2022. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/Evaluation_and_Assessment_Synthesis_Report.pdf. Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Robertson, C., Al-Moasseb, Z., Noonan, Z. & Boyle, J. G. (2021). The 3-D Skills Model: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Study Comparing a Novel 1–1 Near-Peer Teaching Model to a Formative OSCE with Self-regulated Practice. Medical Science Educator. 31, 1789-1801. Ross, M. (2011). Cultivating the Arts in Education and Therapy. Abingdon: Routledge. Roy, S., Modak, A., Barik, D. and Goon, S. (2019). An Overview of Semantic Search Engines. International Journal of Research and Review. 10 (6): 73-85. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18 (2): 118-144. Schmidt, C. (2018). Formatives Assessment als Aspekt professioneller diagnostischer Kompetenz im Kontext des Grundschulunterrichts [Formative assessment as aspect of professional diagnostic competency in primary school education]. In Miller, S., Holler-Nowitzki, B., Kottmann, B., Lesemann, S., Letmathe-Henkel, B., Meyer, N., Schroeder, R. & Velten, K. (eds). Profession und Disziplin: Grundschulpädagogik im Diskurs [Profession and discipline: discourse in primary school pedagogy] (pp. 158-163). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Schmidt, C. (2019). Formatives Assessment in der Grundschule: Konzept, Einschätzungen der Lehrkräfte und Zusammenhänge [Formative Assessment at the Elementary Level: Concept, Considerations and Connections]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. In Tyler, R. W., Gagné, R. M. & Scriven, M. (eds). Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Schwartz, B. (2016). Google’s search knows about over 130 trillion pages. Accessed May 02, 2020. https://searchengineland.com/googles-search-indexes-hits-130-trillion-pages-documents-263378. Stahl, S. (2011). Investitionen in Fortbildung sind Investitionen in die Zukunft: Interview mit dem Kasseler Erziehungswissenschaftler Prof. Dr. Lipowsky [Investments in professional development are investments in the future: interview with Kassel-based educationist Prof. Dr. Lipowsky]. Bildung Bewegt. No. 13 (June), pp. 10-14. Stiggins, R. (2005). Assessment for learning defined. ETS/Assessment Training Institute's International Conference: Promoting Sound Assessment in Every Classroom. Port-land, Oregon, September 2005. Accessed 19 September, 2020. http://downloads.pearsonassessments.com/ati/downloads/afldefined.pdf. Straumberger, W. (2017). Wirksamkeit von Selbstdiagnose beim Üben [Effectiveness of Self-Assessment during Practice]. In Kortenkamp, U. & Kuzle, A. (eds). Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2017 [2017 papers on mathematics instruction] (pp. 957-960). Münster: WTM-Verlag. Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education. 38 (3), pp. 323-342. Treve, M. (2021). English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Lecturers' perceptions of formative assessment integration in the Thai EAP context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 17(2), 1096-1113. United Nations Population Fund (2020). Assessing the quality of developmental evaluations at UNFPA. UNFPA Evaluation Office. Accessed 10 April, 2022. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/admin-resource/DE_EQA_FINAL.pdf Waters, J. (2015). Snowball sampling: a cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 18 (4): 367-380. Williamson, K., Given, L. M. & Scifleet, P. (2018). Qualitative data analysis, 2nd Ed. In Williamson, K. & Johanson, G. (eds). Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts (pp. 453-476). Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing.