The money multiplier and competing theories of money creation: empirical validation for Russia

[thumbnail of GrishchenkoMihailovTkachevCJEAccepted240917_MonMult&CompThsOfBkgEmpValidForRussia.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Grishchenko, V., Mihailov, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-4029 and Tkachev, V. (2024) The money multiplier and competing theories of money creation: empirical validation for Russia. Cambridge Journal of Economics. ISSN 1464-3545 doi: 10.1093/cje/beae036 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

For decades, the monetary economics literature has considered multiple deposit expansion via the money multiplier as theoretically and empirically corroborated. However, the developments witnessed in advanced economies since the Global Fi- nancial Crisis challenged this settled view. We revisit it empirically in the context of the banking system of a big emerging market economy, Russia, from 2005 through 2019, also comparing our results to findings for the United States. In doing so, we review the theoretical underpinnings of money creation and propose an economet- ric test that is applied to the Russian case. Our contribution is to show that the credit theory of money (CTM) – and not the fractional reserve theory (FRT) or the financial intermediation theory (FIT) – is the most supported by the Russian monthly data. We reach this conclusion employing a vector autoregression model and finding robust evidence that nowadays bank lending in Russia is constrained mainly by credit demand, as in the United States.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/118484
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/cje/beae036
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar