Cross-institutional collaborative autoethnography (CAE) as an inclusive and flexible way of researching EAP pedagogies and practice

[thumbnail of 118436 AAM.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Rolinska, A., Carr, C., Maxwell, C. and Sizer, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2750-6728 (2024) Cross-institutional collaborative autoethnography (CAE) as an inclusive and flexible way of researching EAP pedagogies and practice. In: Morisson, B. R., MacDiarmid, C., Williams, A. and Haghi, I. (eds.) Exploring pedagogical approaches in EAP teaching – Proceedings of the 2021 BALEAP Conference. Garnet, pp. 59-69. ISBN 9781782609384

Abstract/Summary

This paper reflects on the use of CAE to conduct a systematic cross-institutional study exploring EAP pedagogies in the creative disciplines. Autoethnography, as an established method of making sense of personal experiences (Ellis et al., 2011), offered the opportunity to place our own experience, practice and working contexts at the centre of the research, providing rich data for our study. The collaborative nature of CAE allowed us to engage in dialogic reflection, and to ‘analyse and interpret (our) data collectively in order to gain a meaningful understanding of (the) sociocultural phenomena’ (Chang et al., 2012, p. 24). This paper outlines the five-stage process of systematic data generation and analysis undertaken through the themes of the journey as scholars, practitioners and individuals, concluding with the benefits of the method as well as potential limitations. We found that CAE can be an inclusive method appropriate for use in scholarship contexts exploring pedagogical practices. It allows practitioners to explore their practice through collaborative and dialogic reflection, thus giving the outcomes a wider relevance beyond the individual. We conclude by considering possible applications of the method in alternative contexts.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/118436
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > International Study and Language Institute (ISLI)
Publisher Garnet
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar