Conceptualising just transition litigation

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Savaresi, A., Setzer, J., Bookman, S., Bouwer, K., Chan, T., Keuschnigg, I., Armeni, C., Harrington, A., Heri, C., Higham, I., Hilson, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-6471, Luporini, R., Macchi, C., Nordlander, L., Obani, P., Peterson, L., Schapper, A., Singh Ghaleigh, N., Tigre, M. A. and Wewerinke-Singh, M. (2024) Conceptualising just transition litigation. Nature Sustainability, 7 (11). pp. 1379-1384. ISSN 2398-9629 doi: 10.1038/s41893-024-01439-y

Abstract/Summary

The transition towards low-carbon societies is creating winners and losers, raising new questions of justice. Around the world, litigation increasingly articulates these justice questions, challenging laws, projects and policies aimed at delivering climate change adaptation and/or mitigation. In this Perspective, we define and conceptualise the phenomenon of 'just transition litigation.' This concept provides a new frame to identify and understand the diverse justice claims of those affected by climate action. We set out a research agenda to further investigate this phenomenon, with a view to enhancing societal acceptance and support for the transition.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/118352
Identification Number/DOI 10.1038/s41893-024-01439-y
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Springer Nature
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar