Working out the priority rules for competing claims to the trustee’s indemnity

[thumbnail of Trustee Priorities for deposit.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 March 2026.
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 March 2026

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Whayman, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5646 (2024) Working out the priority rules for competing claims to the trustee’s indemnity. Journal of Equity, 17 (3). pp. 241-267. ISSN 1833-2137

Abstract/Summary

The trustee’s indemnity, at its simplest, is the right of the trustee to have recourse to trust property for expenses properly incurred in the service of the trust. It is a proprietary right, but there is no legislation determining its priority rules between trust entities. While the rules for priority as between trustees and beneficiaries, trust creditors and personal creditors, and between trustees have been settled by the courts, the others have not.This article therefore considers the possible priority rules and their justifications in those cases. In doing so it sets out the settled rules for convenient reference and basis for further argument. It goes on to consider cases of contests between trust creditors of the same class, between trust creditors of different classes (bearing in mind contractual and legislative provisions limiting recourse to personal assets) and between beneficiary-investors.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117614
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher LexisNexis Australia
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar