Obligation and property in tracing claims

[thumbnail of Whayman - Tracing Claims for deposit CORRECTED.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Whayman, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5646 (2018) Obligation and property in tracing claims. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2). pp. 157-174. ISSN 0010-8200

Abstract/Summary

Reflects on the continuing role of fiduciary obligations (FOs) in equitable tracing, and why a purely property-based model is insufficient. Compares key elements of the competing FO and property models of tracing, and details the development of FO models since the 18th century, the flexibility they offer, and their role where trustees mix trust money with their own but preserve the value of the trust. Suggests why both models have a role to play.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117608
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Sweet and Maxwell
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar