Measuring tail risk

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of ssrn-3789005.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Dierkes, M., Hollstein, F., Prokopczuk, M. and Würsig, C. M. (2024) Measuring tail risk. Journal of Econometrics, 241 (2). 105769. ISSN 1872-6895 doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105769

Abstract/Summary

We comprehensively investigate the usefulness of tail risk measures proposed in the literature. We evaluate their statistical as well as their economic validity. The option-implied measure of Bollerslev and Todorov (2011b) (BT11Q) performs best overall. While some other tail risk measures excel at specialized tasks, BT11Q performs well in all tests: First, BT11Q can predict both future tail events and future tail volatility. Second, it has predictive power for returns in both the time series and the cross-section, as well as for real economic activity. Finally, a simulation analysis shows that the main driver of performance is measurement error.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117476
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105769
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar