Strategic relationships and proxy utilization in contemporary armed conflict

[thumbnail of Permanently restricted]
Text (Permanently restricted) - Thesis
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Fox_form.pdf]
Text - Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Fox, A. C. (2024) Strategic relationships and proxy utilization in contemporary armed conflict. PhD thesis, University of Reading. doi: 10.48683/1926.00116935

Abstract/Summary

This thesis builds on the existing work of proxy war scholars and practitioner experience to generate a broad theory of proxy war that rests on three pillars. First, two basic models of proxy war exist – traditional and technology diffusion models. Second, five basic relationship types materialize in contemporary proxy wars – exploited, coerced, transactional, cultural, and contractual. Third, one of two basic strategies animates proxy force utilization – deniability and minimalist. Those three factors work in unison with one another, changing as needed as conditions change in the conflict, but also externally within the international community, to affect a specific conflict’s character. In the end, I assert that those factors contribute to armed conflict becoming increasingly attritional, urban, and elongated. As the wars in Ukraine and Gaza continue, the paradigm of proxy war I have described becomes even more valid.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Thesis (PhD)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/116935
Identification Number/DOI 10.48683/1926.00116935
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar