Promoting late-life volunteering with timebanking: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study in Hong Kong

[thumbnail of igae056.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lu, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-4883, Chui, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-5724, Lum, T., Liu, T. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-5342, Wong, G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-942X and Chan, W. (2024) Promoting late-life volunteering with timebanking: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study in Hong Kong. Innovation in Aging. ISSN 2399-5300 doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae056 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Background and Objectives This study explores the impact of timebanking, where individuals earn time credits, non-monetary currency, for volunteering, on promoting volunteerism among older adults. Research Design and Methods We employed a quasi-experimental design with 116 timebank group (TBG) participants and 114 comparison group (CG) participants from 2021-2022. TBG received time credits to exchange for rewards, while CG received no time credits (i.e., volunteering as usual). The intervention of timebanking lasted for one year. Volunteering behaviors were tracked via an app, and intentions to volunteer were assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (the midpoint of the intervention, T1), and after 12 months (the endpoint of the intervention, T2). The use of rewards by TBG participants was also recorded (e.g., for personal use or sharing with others). Furthermore, focus group interviews were conducted to understand how rewards influenced participants’ volunteerism. Results TBG had significantly higher weekly volunteer hours at T2 (β = 1.37, p = 0.021) and increased intent to volunteer at T1 (β = 0.54, p = 0.001) and T2 (β = 0.51, p = 0.001) compared to CG. Participants using rewards personally volunteered more at T2 (β = 2.09, p = 0.014), although sharing rewards with family and friends or donating rewards to others did not yield the same effect. The qualitative study suggested that a sense of feeling recognized generated by timebanking may encourage increased volunteering and that personal reward use enriched the volunteer experience, and individuals sharing rewards with family and friends experienced a sense of fulfillment and reinforcement of their prosociality. Discussion and Implications Timebanking effectively encourages late-life volunteering. The study provides practical implications for promoting volunteering among older people.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/116817
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/geroni/igae056
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar