Emissions intensity: do we need a CBAM for oil and gas imports?

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hilson, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-6471 (2023) Emissions intensity: do we need a CBAM for oil and gas imports? Journal of World Energy Law & Business. ISSN 1754-9965 doi: 10.1093/jwelb/jwad036

Abstract/Summary

The UK has seen significant recent attention being paid to the issue of the ‘emissions intensity’ of oil and gas operations, with the oil and gas industry and the Government using this as a climate justification for domestic North Sea production over imported oil and gas. This commentary explores these arguments in the context of the Rosebank decision and examines why emission intensity matters for lawyers. One key reason identified involves trade: without a carbon border adjustment mechanism (tax) or equivalent on imports of oil and gas from countries with poor records on electrification, flaring and vented emissions, domestic oil and gas production faces unfair climate competition.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114262
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/jwelb/jwad036
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar