Do professional forecasters believe in the Phillips curve?

[thumbnail of Phillips_Curve_IJF_Sep_2023 (3).pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 May 2026.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 May 2026

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 (2024) Do professional forecasters believe in the Phillips curve? International Journal of Forecasting, 40 (3). pp. 1238-1254. ISSN 0169-2070 doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.11.004

Abstract/Summary

The expectations-augmented Phillips curve (PC) is a cornerstone of many macroeconomic models. We consider the extent to which professional forecasters’ inflation and unemployment rate forecasts are ‘theory consistent’, and find much heterogeneity. Perceptions about the responsiveness of inflation to the unemployment rate are shown to depend on whether the respondent was active earlier or later during the period 1981–2019, and on whether the respondent happened to forecast at times of tight labour markets. At the shortest horizon, theory-consistency is related to more accurate forecasts, but not significantly so at longer horizons. At longer horizons PC-model heterogeneity accounts for the lion’s share of the observed disagreement in reported inflation forecasts.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/113985
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.11.004
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar