Varieties of approaches to constructing Physical Climate Storylines: a review

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Physical Climate Storylines draft REVISION 4 FINAL no tc.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Table_supplement.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Baldissera Pacchetti, M., Coulter, L., Dessai, S., Shepherd, T. G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-9968, Sillmann, J. and Van den Hurk, B. (2024) Varieties of approaches to constructing Physical Climate Storylines: a review. WIREs Climate Change, 15 (2). e869. ISSN 1757-7799 doi: 10.1002/wcc.869

Abstract/Summary

The Physical Climate Storyline (PCS) approach is increasingly recognized by the physical climate research community as a tool to produce and communicate decision-relevant climate risk information. While PCS is generally understood as a single concept, different varieties of the approach are applied according to the aims and purposes of the PCS and the scientists that build them. To unpack this diversity of detail, this paper gives an overview of key practices and assumptions of the PCS approach as developed by physical climate scientists, as well as their ties to similar approaches developed by the broader climate risk and adaptation research community. We first examine varieties of PCS according to the length of the causal chain they explore, and the type of evidence used. We then describe how they incorporate counterfactual elements and the temporal perspective. Finally, we examine how value judgements are implicitly or explicitly included in the aims and construction of PCS. We conclude the discussion by suggesting that the PCS approach can further mature in the way it incorporates the narrative element, in the way it incorporates value judgments, and in the way that the evidence chosen to build PCS constrains what is considered plausible.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/113954
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/wcc.869
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar