The opposition of models and narratives in the field of human rights

[thumbnail of EXPO_IDA(2023)702584_EN.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Freedman, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-9026, (2023) The opposition of models and narratives in the field of human rights. Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels. pp49. ISBN 9789284804597 doi: 10.2861/50887

Abstract/Summary

This In-depth analysis focuses on competing human rights narratives, particularly those that challenge or undermine the priorities set out in the European Union (EU) Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024. It identifies the strategies deployed to advance those narratives internationally, some of the main proponents of those narratives and key motivations for those agendas. The paper provides evidence-based recommendations for ways in which the EU may counter those narratives. In particular, it highlights the need for the EU to advance a human rights-centred approach to development and preventing economic insecurity. Human rights should be prioritised across all EU activities with third parties. Moreover, competing human narratives should be countered by strengthening civil society and seeking new ways to oppose the soft power initiatives being deployed to advance competing narratives globally.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Report (Report)
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112614
Identification Number/DOI 10.2861/50887
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Publications Office of the European Union
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar