Construction waste management in UAE: an exploratory study

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hittini, B. Y. and Shibeika, A. I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-9241 (2019) Construction waste management in UAE: an exploratory study. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 238. pp. 679-686. ISSN 1746-448X doi: 10.2495/sc190581

Abstract/Summary

In 2016, 9.68 million tons of solid waste were generated in Abu Dhabi alone where 67.8% was sent to dumpsites and landfills. In the same year, the construction and demolishing (C&D) industry produced 47% of the non-hazardous waste. This research aims to investigate the C&D waste management in UAE’s construction industry, specifically in Abu Dhabi based on (a) official resources identifying authorized entities, regulations, implementation guidelines, and causes behind waste generation in UAE’ C&D industry; and (b) unstructured interviews with construction professionals in Abu Dhabi revealing the waste management consideration process, enhancement methods, professionals’ responsibilities and views toward the topic. While Abu Dhabi’s sustainability framework (Estidama) requires a submittal of C&D Waste Management Plan (CDWMP) prior to any construction activity asking for a minimum of 30% waste diversion from landfills, relevant literature highlighted awareness as an effective factor in C&D management. Interviews for this study have shown that a lack of awareness is still affecting the C&D waste management and control negatively. Interviewees have also contributed in understanding the waste management consideration process, enhancement methods, professionals’ responsibilities and views toward the topic highlighting that implementation practices seem to seek Estidama certification but not a sustainable environment.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112457
Identification Number/DOI 10.2495/sc190581
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher WIT Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar