Jackman, A.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4832-4955, Richardson, M. and Veber, M.
(2024)
Where are the pandemic drones? On the ‘failure’ of automated aerial solutionism.
New Media and Society, 26 (3).
pp. 1183-1203.
ISSN 1461-7315
doi: 10.1177/14614448231202137
Abstract/Summary
In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, excitement broke out around the potential for drones to generate aerial solutions to devilish pandemic problems. But despite the hype, pandemic drones largely failed to take to the sky and far from the scale initially imagined. This article pursues the failure of the pandemic drone to materialise, showing how it nevertheless functioned as a locus of experimentation for remote logics and processes. As such, we shift focus away from what the pandemic drone is to if and where it – or its logics – can be found. To learn from the pandemic drone, we turn to three trajectories of failure: failure as experiment, failure as imaginary and failure as glitch. With particular attention to specific case studies, we show how failure enables drone logics and processes to migrate across various socio-technical forms, sites and applications of automated decision-making responses to the pandemic.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112402 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1177/14614448231202137 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science |
| Publisher | Sage |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download