Differentially expression analyses in fruit of cultivated and wild species of grape and peach

[thumbnail of open access]
Preview
Text (open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Huang, W., Li, M., Zhang, H., Wu, J., Dunwell, J. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-665X and Zhang, S. (2023) Differentially expression analyses in fruit of cultivated and wild species of grape and peach. Scientific Reports, 13 (1). 1997. ISSN 2045-2322 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29025-w

Abstract/Summary

Through agronomic traits and sequencing data, the cultivated and wild varieties of grapes and peaches were analyzed and compared in terms of fruit size, fruit flavor, fruit resistance, and fruit color. Cultivated grapes and peaches have advantages in fruit size, soluble sugar content, sugar and acid ratio, etc. Wild grapes and peaches have utility value in resistance. The results showed that there were 878 and 301 differentially expressed genes in cultivated and wild grapes and peaches in the three growth stages, respectively based on the next-generation sequencing study. Ten and twelve genes related to the differences between cultivated and wild grapes and peaches were found respectively. Among them, three genes, namely chalcone synthase (CHS), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH1) were present in both cultivated and wild grapes and peaches.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/110403
Identification Number/DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-29025-w
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Crop Science
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar