Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Prediction of enteric methane emissions by sheep using an intercontinental database

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Belanche, A., Hristov, A. N., van Lingen, H. J., Denman, S. E., Kebreab, E., Schwarm, A., Kreuzer, M., Niu, M., Eugene, M., Niderkorn, V., Martin, C., Archimede, H., McGee, M., Reynolds, C. K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4152-1190, Crompton, L. A., Bayat, A. R., Yu, Z., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Chaves, A. V., Clark, H., Muetzel, S., Lind, V., Moorby, J., Rooke, J. A., Aubry, A., Antezana, W., Wang, M., Hegarty, R., Oddy, V. H., Hill, J., Vercoe, P. E., Savian, J. V., Abdalla, A. L., Soltan, Y. A., Monteiro, A. L. G., Ku-Vera, J. C., Jaurena, G., Gomez-Bravo, C. A., Mayorga, O. L., Congio, G. F. S. and Yanez-Ruiz, D. R. (2023) Prediction of enteric methane emissions by sheep using an intercontinental database. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384. 135523. ISSN 0959-6526 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135523

Abstract/Summary

Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from sheep contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions from livestock. However, as already available for dairy and beef cattle, empirical models are needed to predict CH4 emissions from sheep for accounting purposes. The objectives of this study were to: 1) collate an intercontinental database of enteric CH4 emissions from individual sheep; 2) identify the key variables for predicting enteric sheep CH4 absolute production (g/d per animal) and yield [g/kg dry matter intake (DMI)] and their respective relationships; and 3) develop and cross-validate global equations as well as the potential need for age-, diet-, or climatic regionspecific equations. The refined intercontinental database included 2,135 individual animal data from 13 countries. Linear CH4 prediction models were developed by incrementally adding variables. A universal CH4 production equation using only DMI led to a root mean square prediction error (RMSPE, % of observed mean) of 25.4% and an RMSPE-standard deviation ratio (RSR) of 0.69. Universal equations that, in addition to DMI, also included body weight (DMI + BW), and organic matter digestibility (DMI + OMD + BW) improved the prediction performance further (RSR, 0.62 and 0.60), whereas diet composition variables had negligible effects. These universal equations had lower prediction error than the extant IPCC 2019 equations. Developing age-specific models for adult sheep (>1-year-old) including DMI alone (RSR = 0.66) or in combination with rumen propionate molar proportion (for research of more refined purposes) substantially improved prediction performance (RSR = 0.57) on a smaller dataset. On the contrary, for young sheep (<1-year-old), the universal models could be applied, instead of age-specific models, if DMI and BW were included. Universal models showed similar prediction performances to the diet- and region-specific models. However, optimal prediction equations led to different regression coefficients (i.e. intercepts and slopes) for universal, age-specific, diet-specific, and regionspecific models with predictive implications. Equations for CH4 yield led to low prediction performances, with DMI being negatively and BW and OMD positively correlated with CH4 yield. In conclusion, predicting sheep CH4 production requires information on DMI and prediction accuracy will improve national and global inventories if separate equations for young and adult sheep are used with the additional variables BW, OMD and rumen propionate proportion. Appropriate universal equations can be used to predict CH4 production from sheep across different diets and climatic conditions.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/109438
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Animal Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Centre for Dairy Research (CEDAR)
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar