Fakespeak in 280 characters: using a corpus-based approach to study the language of disinformation on Twitter

[thumbnail of Chapter]
Text (Chapter) - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Jaworska, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-2245 (2023) Fakespeak in 280 characters: using a corpus-based approach to study the language of disinformation on Twitter. In: Maci, S. M., Demata, M., McGlashan, M. and Seargeant, P. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Discourse and Disinformation. Routledge. ISBN 9781032124254

Abstract/Summary

This chapter explores a corpus of fake news spread on Twitter in 2016 and 2017 by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) also known as the Russian troll factory. The corpus of fake news is compared with verified news tweets produced by the international news agency Associated Press (AP) and more sensationalist news tweets disseminated by the British middle-range tabloid the Daily Mail. The comparison is performed employing the techniques of a corpus-based approach to discourse, specifically the tool of keywords, which has been successfully used in past research to identify distinctive lexico-grammatical features of various genres or registers (e.g. Xiao and McEnery 2005; Friginal 2009; Breeze 2019). Research has shown that the difference between, for example, telling lies vs telling truth sits not so much in the content but precisely in the style or the how of telling (Galasiński 2000). Identifying distinctive lexico-grammatical features of fake news can therefore shed light on the particularities and peculiarities of its style allowing researchers to better understand how disinformation is linguistically constructed and how to better recognise misleading contents. Therefore, this chapter pursues two major goals; first, it showcases how a keyword analysis can be effectively used to identify distinctive language features of disinformation online; secondly, it endeavours to raise awareness of the particularities and peculiarities of the language of fake news that might help foster critical (social) media literacy.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/109125
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Uncontrolled Keywords fake news, disinformation, Twitter, corpus linguistics, parts of speech
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar