State responsibility for genocide: a follow-up

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Milanović, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-6096 (2007) State responsibility for genocide: a follow-up. European Journal of International Law, 18 (4). pp. 669-694. ISSN 1464-3596 doi: 10.1093/ejil/chm043

Abstract/Summary

The article comments on the recent judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Genocide case, and discusses several issues which arise from it. It first briefly explains the several constraints under which the Court had to operate in deciding this case, most notably its limited jurisdiction, the legally very strict definition of genocide, and the litigation strategies of the two parties. The article then turns to examining two specific issues that the Court did not address in a fully satisfactory manner, namely the question of Serbia's responsibility for the acts of the Scorpions paramilitary group, as well as the Court's refusal to ask Serbia to produce certain confidential military documents. The Court's analysis of state responsibility for complicity in genocide and state responsibility for failing to prevent genocide is then addressed. The article finally criticizes the Court's reasoning when it comes to reparation and remedies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/108069
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/ejil/chm043
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar