From compromise to principle: clarifying the concept of state jurisdiction in human rights treaties

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Milanović, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-6096 (2008) From compromise to principle: clarifying the concept of state jurisdiction in human rights treaties. Human Rights Law Review, 8 (3). pp. 411-448. ISSN 1744-1021 doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngn021

Abstract/Summary

This article analyses the notion of state jurisdiction in international human rights treaties, which is central for determining their territorial scope of application. In that regard, the article provides an overview of jurisdiction clauses in the relevant treaties and examines their historical origins. It then attempts to distinguish this notion from state responsibility and from the concept of state jurisdiction in general international law.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/108066
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/hrlr/ngn021
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar