The impact of proposed intimate image abuse offences on domestic violence and abuse

[thumbnail of The impact of proposed intimate image abuse offences on domestic violence and abuse - accepted version.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bishop, C. (2022) The impact of proposed intimate image abuse offences on domestic violence and abuse. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 73 (AD2). pp. 125-153. ISSN 0029-3105 doi: 10.53386/nilq.v73iAD2.969

Abstract/Summary

This article explores how proposed reforms to the law on intimate image abuse could address situations where intimate images are shared, or threats to share are made, in a relationship where there is domestic violence and abuse (DVA). In exploring the purposes and motivations behind the use of non-consensual intimate images in this context, the harmful impact is demonstrated to be the denial of autonomy and personhood that ‘entraps’ the victim in the relationship. It is essential that this harm, and the underlying motivations of those who use intimate image abuse for this purpose, is made visible under the proposed legislation to ensure that the criminal law effectively condemns and remedies conduct of this kind. It is for this reason that the article concludes that the Law Commission is right to consider introducing an offence of ‘intentionally taking or sharing an intimate image without consent with the intent to control or coerce the person depicted.’ It is further suggested that this fault element may better reflect the culpability of those who engage in threats to share intimate images and should be introduced not just where images are taken and shared, but also where threats to share such images are made.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/107364
Identification Number/DOI 10.53386/nilq.v73iAD2.969
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher School of Law, Queen's University Belfast
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar