Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

The red mist

[thumbnail of Open Access]
JESP+-+24-1+-+A2+-+Lepoutre.pdf - Published Version (264kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of Final manuscript.pdf]
Final manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version (246kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lepoutre, M. C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-8585 (2023) The red mist. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 24 (1). ISSN 1559-3061 doi: 10.26556/jesp.v24i1.2145

Abstract/Summary

An influential critique of anger holds that anger comes at an important epistemic cost. In particular, feeling angry typically makes risk less visible to us. This is anger’s ‘red mist.’ These epistemic costs, critics suggest, arguably outweigh the epistemic benefits commonly ascribed to anger. This essay argues that the epistemic critique of anger is misguided. This is not because it underestimates anger’s epistemic benefits, but rather because it overlooks the fact that anger’s red mist performs a crucial moral function. By concealing risk, the red mist helps protect the dignity and self-respect of those who live under severe and unchosen risk. This function is vitally important in non-ideal circumstances, where many are unjustly subjected to dignity-impairing risk. And it is irreplaceable, in that it cannot readily be performed by other political emotions, such as hope.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106682
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Publisher University of Southern California
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar