Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Should philosophical reflection on ethics do without moral concepts?

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hooker, B. (2022) Should philosophical reflection on ethics do without moral concepts? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16. ISSN 1572-8447 doi: 10.1007/s10677-022-10303-x

Abstract/Summary

Roger Crisp, in his book Reasons and Goodness, argues in favour of de-moralizing our philosophical reflection on ethics. This paper begins by explaining what ‘de-moralizing’ means. Then the paper assesses Crisp’s argument for de-moralizing and puts forward arguments against de-moralizing.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106612
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar