Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

The differences and similarities between curiosity and interest: meta-analysis and network analyses

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
1-s2.0-S0959475222000494-main.pdf - Published Version (2MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Tang et al_Curiosity and Interest_accepted_LnI (1).pdf]
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Tang, X., Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S. E., Murayama, K., Lavonen, J. and Salmela-Aro, K. (2022) The differences and similarities between curiosity and interest: meta-analysis and network analyses. Learning and Instruction, 80. 101628. ISSN 0959-4752 doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101628

Abstract/Summary

Three studies on the relationship between curiosity and interest are reported. The first study was a meta-analysis that examined the Pearson correlations between scales assessing curiosity and interest. Based on 24 studies (31 effect sizes), we found that the curiosity scales correlated with the interest scales at a moderate level (r = 0.53), but they had extremely high heterogeneity. The second and third studies applied network analyses (i.e., co-occurrence analysis and correlation-based analysis) to data that was collected using experience sampling method. Across the studies, we found that while the feelings of curiosity reflected feelings of inquisitiveness, the feelings of interest were aligned with positive affect such as enjoyment and happiness. Importantly, an asymmetrical pattern also was found in curiosity-interest co-occurrences: when feelings of curiosity occurred, the co-occurrence of feelings of interest was highly likely, but not so vice versa. Overall, our findings suggest that feelings of curiosity are special cases of feelings of interest that pertain to knowledge acquisition. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/105256
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar