Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Stewart, A. J., Farran, E. K., Grange, J. A., Macleod, M., Munafò, M., Newton, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-4204 and Shanks, D. R. (2021) Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement. BMC Research Notes, 14 (1). 458. ISSN 1756-0500 doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3

Abstract/Summary

Abstract: The adoption and incentivisation of open and transparent research practices is critical in addressing issues around research reproducibility and research integrity. These practices will require training and funding. Individuals need to be incentivised to adopt open and transparent research practices (e.g., added as desirable criteria in hiring, probation, and promotion decisions, recognition that funded research should be conducted openly and transparently, the importance of publishers mandating the publication of research workflows and appropriately curated data associated with each research output). Similarly, institutions need to be incentivised to encourage the adoption of open and transparent practices by researchers. Research quality should be prioritised over research quantity. As research transparency will look different for different disciplines, there can be no one-size-fits-all approach. An outward looking and joined up UK research strategy is needed that places openness and transparency at the heart of research activity. This should involve key stakeholders (institutions, research organisations, funders, publishers, and Government) and crucially should be focused on action. Failure to do this will have negative consequences not just for UK research, but also for our ability to innovate and subsequently commercialise UK-led discovery.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/101970
Identification Number/DOI 10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3
Refereed Yes
Divisions Central Services > Office of the Vice Chancellor
Publisher Springer Nature
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar