Chandler-Wilde, S. N.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-1283 and Spence, E. A.
(2022)
Coercivity, essential norms, and the Galerkin method for second-kind integral equations on polyhedral and Lipschitz domains.
Numerische Mathematik, 150.
pp. 299-371.
ISSN 0029-599X
doi: 10.1007/s00211-021-01256-x
Abstract/Summary
It is well known that, with a particular choice of norm, the classical double-layer potential operator $D$ has essential norm $<1/2$ as an operator on the natural trace space $H^{1/2}(\Gamma)$ whenever $\Gamma$ is the boundary of a bounded Lipschitz domain. This implies, for the standard second-kind boundary integral equations for the interior and exterior Dirichlet and Neumann problems in potential theory, convergence of the Galerkin method in $H^{1/2}(\Gamma)$ for any sequence of finite-dimensional subspaces $(\cH_N)_{N=1}^\infty$ that is asymptotically dense in $H^{1/2}(\Gamma)$. Long-standing open questions are whether the essential norm is also $<1/2$ for $D$ as an operator on $L^2(\Gamma)$ for all Lipschitz $\Gamma$ in 2-d; or whether, for all Lipschitz $\Gamma$ in 2-d and 3-d, or at least for the smaller class of Lipschitz polyhedra in 3-d, the weaker condition holds that the operators $\pm \frac{1}{2}I+D$ are compact perturbations of coercive operators -- this a necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of the Galerkin method for every sequence of subspaces $(\cH_N)_{N=1}^\infty$ that is asymptotically dense in $L^2(\Gamma)$. We settle these open questions negatively. We give examples of 2-d and 3-d Lipschitz domains with Lipschitz constant equal to one for which the essential norm of $D$ is $\geq 1/2$, and examples with Lipschitz constant two for which the operators $\pm \frac{1}{2}I +D$ are not coercive plus compact. We also give, for every $C>0$, examples of Lipschitz polyhedra for which the essential norm is $\geq C$ and for which $\lambda I+D$ is not a compact perturbation of a coercive operator for any real or complex $\lambda$ with $|\lambda|\leq C$. We then, via a new result on the Galerkin method in Hilbert spaces, explore the implications of these results for the convergence of Galerkin boundary element methods in the $L^2(\Gamma)$ setting. Finally, we resolve negatively a related open question in the convergence theory for collocation methods, showing that, for our polyhedral examples, there is no weighted norm on $C(\Gamma)$, equivalent to the standard supremum norm, for which the essential norm of $D$ on $C(\Gamma)$ is $<1/2$.
Altmetric Badge
| Additional Information | There is a correction to this article published 14/06/23, please see: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-023-01357-9 |
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/101202 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1007/s00211-021-01256-x |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics |
| Additional Information | There is a correction to this article published 14/06/23, please see: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-023-01357-9 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download