Underwhelming supervening acts: R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450 (30/03/2021)

Download

[thumbnail of R v Lanning and Camille (case note) final accepted version.pdf]

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Krebs, B. (2021) Underwhelming supervening acts: R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450 (30/03/2021). The Journal of Criminal Law, 85 (5). pp. 403-405. ISSN 0022-0183 doi: 10.1177/00220183211044289

Abstract/Summary

This is a case note on R v Lanning and Camille [2021] EWCA Crim 450. It considers the concept of ‘overwhelming supervening acts’ (OSA) and its relationship to the ‘fundamental difference rule’ (FDR).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100414
Identification Number/DOI	10.1177/00220183211044289
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher	Sage
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	28 Sep 2021 13:32	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	09 Jun 2024 02:22	Date item last modified

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar