Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97

Download

[thumbnail of R v Thacker (final accepted version).pdf]

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Krebs, B. (2021) Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97. Journal of Criminal Law, 85 (3). pp. 232-235. ISSN 1740-5580 doi: 10.1177/00220183211008679

Abstract/Summary

This is a case note on R v Thacker [2021] EWCA Crim 97 considering whether the trial judge had erred in convicting 15 activists who had breached an airport perimeter fence of intentionally disrupting services, contrary to the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 s.1(2)(b). Issues discussed concern statutory interpretation, jury directions and the meaning of intent.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100412
Identification Number/DOI	10.1177/00220183211008679
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher	SAGE
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	28 Sep 2021 08:37	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	23 Jun 2024 02:34	Date item last modified

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar