Reproductive performance of the generalist predator Hypoaspis aculeifer (Acari : Gamasida) when foraging on different invertebrate prey

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Heckmann, L. H., Ruf, A., Nienstedt, K. M. and Krogh, P. H. (2007) Reproductive performance of the generalist predator Hypoaspis aculeifer (Acari : Gamasida) when foraging on different invertebrate prey. Applied Soil Ecology, 36 (2-3). pp. 130-135. ISSN 0929-1393 doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.01.002

Abstract/Summary

In this study, we assessed the influence of prey quality and prey biomass during a standardized 3-week test on adult survival and reproductive output of the predatory mite Hypoaspis aculeifer when fed one of six different diets: springtails (Folsomia candida and Folsomia fimetaria), a storage mite (Caloglyphus cf. michaeli), an oligochaete (Enchytraeus crypticus), a nematode (Turbatrix silusiae), and a 1:1:1 mix of F. candida:F.fimetaria:E. crypticus. Our results revealed that a single prey species may be nutritionally sufficient for a 3-week period, as H. aculeifer performed equally well, or better, on a diet based on a 1:1:1 mix of F. candida:F. fimetaria:E. crypticus. However, when fed C. cf. michaeli, H. aculeifer had a poor reproductive output (< 200 juveniles) and a reduced survival (60-70%). Thus, investigators should validate their choice of prey prior to testing H. aculeifer performance during toxicant exposure. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/10009
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.01.002
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences
Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Soil Research Centre
Uncontrolled Keywords predator-prey interactions, prey quality, prey density, survival, non-target arthropods, toxicity test, SOIL, MITE, LAELAPIDAE, FOOD
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar