Comprehending non-literal language: effects of aging and bilingualism

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Comprehending non-literal language Manuscript Oct 2018_revised-accept -changes.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Comprehending non-literal language Manuscript Oct 2018_revised-accept -changes.2.pdf]
Preview
Text - Supplemental Material
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Comprehending non-literal language Manuscript Oct 2018_revised-accept -changes.3.pdf]
Preview
Text - Supplemental Material
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sundaray, S., Marinis, T. and Bose, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0193-5292 (2018) Comprehending non-literal language: effects of aging and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 2230. ISSN 1664-1078 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02230

Abstract/Summary

A pressing issue that the 21st century is facing in many parts of the developed world is a rapidly aging population. Whilst several studies have looked at aging older adults and their language use in terms of vocabulary, syntax and sentence comprehension, few have focused on the comprehension of non-literal language (i.e. pragmatic inference-making) by aging older adults, and even fewer, if any, have explored the effects of bilingualism on pragmatic inferences of non-literal language by aging older bilinguals. Thus, the present study examined the effects of age(ing) and the effects of bilingualism on aging older adults’ ability to infer non-literal meaning. Four groups of participants made up of monolingual English-speaking and bilingual English-Tamil speaking young (17–23 years) and older (60– 83 years) adults were tested with pragmatic tasks that included non-conventional indirect requests, conversational implicatures, conventional metaphors and novel metaphors for both accuracy and efficiency in terms of response times. While the study did not find any significant difference between monolinguals and bilinguals on pragmatic inferences, there was a significant effect of age on one type of non-literal language tested: conventional metaphors. The effect of age was present only for the monolinguals with aging older monolinguals performing less well than the young monolinguals. Aging older bilingual adults were not affected by age whilst processing conventional metaphors. This suggests a bilingual advantage in pragmatic inferences of conventional metaphors.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/80705
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02230
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Ageing
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Language and Cognition
Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Literacy and Multilingualism (CeLM)
Publisher Frontiers Media
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar