Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Threats to the validity of the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+) as a measure of critical thinking skills and implications for Learning Gain

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Aloisi, C. and Callaghan, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-3352 (2018) Threats to the validity of the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+) as a measure of critical thinking skills and implications for Learning Gain. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3 (1). pp. 57-82. ISSN 2375-2696 doi: 10.1080/23752696.2018.1449128

Abstract/Summary

The University of Reading Learning Gain project is a three-year longitudinal project to test and evaluate a range of available methodologies and to draw conclusions on what might be the right combination of instruments for the measurement of Learning Gain in higher education. This paper analyses the validity of a measure of critical thinking skills, the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+) and the implications of using this standardised test as a proxy for Learning Gain. The paper reviews five inferences regarding the interpretations and use of test scores: construct representation, scoring, generalisation, extrapolation and decision-making. Each section reviews some of the available evidence in support of the claims the CLA+ makes and the threats to their validity. The possible impact of these issues on Learning Gain in the UK is considered.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/75934
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Central Services > Office of the Vice Chancellor
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar