Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Evaluation of urban local-scale aerodynamic parameters: implications for the vertical profile of wind speed and for source areas

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
10.1007%2Fs10546-017-0248-z.pdf - Published Version (6MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of CWK_Z0Zd_AcceptedBLmet_March2017.pdf]
CWK_Z0Zd_AcceptedBLmet_March2017.pdf - Accepted Version (2MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Kent, C. W., Grimmond, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-9415, Barlow, J., Gatey, D., Kotthaus, S., Lindberg, F. and Halios, C. H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-8449 (2017) Evaluation of urban local-scale aerodynamic parameters: implications for the vertical profile of wind speed and for source areas. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 164 (2). pp. 183-213. ISSN 0006-8314 doi: 10.1007/s10546-017-0248-z

Abstract/Summary

Nine methods to determine local-scale aerodynamic roughness length (z0) and zero-plane displacement (zd) are compared at three sites (within 60 m of each other) in London, UK. Methods include three anemometric (single-level high frequency observations), six morphometric (surface geometry) and one reference-based approach (look-up tables). A footprint model is used with the morphometric methods in an iterative procedure. The results are insensitive to the initial zd and z0 estimates. Across the three sites, zd varies between 5 – 45 m depending upon the method used. Morphometric methods that incorporate roughness-element height variability agree better with anemometric methods, indicating zd is consistently greater than the local mean building height. Depending upon method and wind direction, z0 varies between 0.1 and 5 m with morphometric z0 consistently being 2 – 3 m larger than the anemometric z0. No morphometric method consistently resembles the anemometric methods. Wind-speed profiles observed with Doppler lidar provide additional data with which to assess the methods. Locally determined roughness parameters are used to extrapolate wind-speed profiles to a height roughly 200 m above the canopy. Wind-speed profiles extrapolated based on morphometric methods that account for roughness-element height variability are most similar to observations. The extent of the modelled source area for measurements varies by up to a factor of three, depending upon the morphometric method used to determine zd and z0.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0267-9
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/69708
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
Additional Information An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0267-9
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar