Masked constituent priming of English compounds in native and nonnative speakers

Downloads

• Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 285–311. • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. • Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, a, & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Mmeory and Cognition, 25(4), 447–457. • Bozic, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. a, Davis, M. H., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1464–75. • Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–90. • Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what , when , where , and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2), 90–98. • Chateau, D., Knudsen, E. V., & Jared, D. (2002). Masked Priming of Prefixes and the Influence of Spelling–Meaning Consistency. Brain and Language, 81(1-3), 587–600. • Clahsen, H., Balkhair, L., Schutter, J.-S., & Cunnings, I. (2013). The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 29(1), 7–31. • Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing. Language Learning, 60(1), 21–43. • Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I., & Blevins, J. P. (2003). Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon : A Dual Mechanism account. In Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 125–155). • Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H. (2008). The time-course of morphological constraints: A study of plurals inside derived words. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 149–175. • Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. University of New South Wales. • Davis, C. J. (2005). N-watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70. • Davis, C. J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural data and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180–206). Psychology Press. • De Cat, C., Klepousniotou, E., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Representational deficit or processing effect? An electrophysiological study of noun-noun compound processing by very advanced L2 speakers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(77), 1–17. • Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Matthews, P. M., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2004). Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(41), 14984–14988. • Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 344–358. • Dijkstra, T., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 7–41. • Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Morris, J., & Diependaele, K. (2013). The role of form in morphological priming: Evidence from bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 967–987. • Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 615–640. • Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Durđević, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 119–135. • Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 684–91. • Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2009). Masked morphological priming of compound constituents. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 159–193. • Fiorentino, R., Naito-billen, Y., Bost, J., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 123–146. • Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(7), 953–1000. • Forster, K. I., & Azuma, T. (2000). Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4-5), 539–561. • Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. J. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. • Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–24. • Frisson, S., Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2014). Phonological and Orthographic Overlap Effects in Fast and Masked Priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(9), 1199–1216. • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1293–1326. • Grainger, J., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 865–84. • Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The Time Course of and Phonological Orthographic Code Activation. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1021–1026. • Hyönä, J. (2012). The role of visual acuity and segmentation cues in compound word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(1), 1–8. • Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M. S., Solomon, M., & Placke, L. (2008). Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 675–687. • Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. • Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 94(Pt 2), 223–44. • Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–33. • Ktori, M., Midgley, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2015). An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with superset primes. Brain Research, 1594, 233–244. • Kuperman, V. (2013). Accentuate the positive: semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(203), 1–10. • Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading Polymorphemic Dutch Compounds: Towards a Multiple Route Model of Lexical Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(3), 876–895. • Lee, H. W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, a. (1999). The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: evidence from the fast-priming technique. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 624–634. • Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84(1), 50–64. • MacGregor, L. J., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG. Brain and Language, 126(2), 217–229. • Marelli, M., Zonca, G., Contardi, A., & Luzzatti, C. (2014). The representation of compound headedness in the mental lexicon: A picture naming study in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 26–39. • Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience And Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 823–836. • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. • McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381–401. • Meisel, J. (2011). First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 496–512. • Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of Inflected Words in a Second Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 403–435. • R Core Team, T. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. • Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942–971. • Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. • Robert, C., & Mathey, S. (2012). The Effect of Prime Duration in Masked Orthographic Priming Depends on Neighborhood Distribution. Language and Speech, 55, 249–262. • Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 529–567. • Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361. • Semenza, C., & Luzzatti, C. (2014). Combining words in the brain: The processing of compound words. Introduction to the special issue. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 1–7. • Shoolman, N., & Andrews, S. (2003). Racehorses, Reindeer and Sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification. In S. Kinoshita & Lupker (Eds.), Masked Priming: The State of the Art (pp. 241–278). Taylor and Francis. • Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 245–260. • Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon, 1, 85–123. • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 638–647. • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical Storage and Retrieval of Polymorphemic and Polysyllabic Words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620. • Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 917–938. • Van Heuven, W. J., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 96–101. • Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368.