Barriers to “industrialisation” for interwar British retailing? The case of Marks & Spencer Ltd.

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Scott, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-9040 and Walker, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-0236 (2017) Barriers to “industrialisation” for interwar British retailing? The case of Marks & Spencer Ltd. Business History, 59 (2). pp. 179-201. ISSN 1743-7938 doi: 10.1080/00076791.2016.1156088

Abstract/Summary

Research on international differences in retail productivity has highlighted formidable environmental barriers to the ‘industrialisation’ of mass retailing as a driver of declining British interwar productivity growth in this sector (and in services more generally). We examine evidence for such barriers, using a case study of a firm that built its interwar expansion strategy on ‘American’ retail methods – Marks & Spencer (M&S). We find that, rather than facing barriers to the adoption of American mass retail practices, M&S reaped major productivity gains from this process. This adds further evidence to an emerging literature rejecting the barriers to industrialisation thesis for retailing.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/62836
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/00076791.2016.1156088
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar