Corporate strategic responses to foreign entry: insights from prospect theory

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Casson, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-6538, Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., Groene, F. and Verbeke, A. (2014) Corporate strategic responses to foreign entry: insights from prospect theory. Multinational Business Review, 22 (3). pp. 294-323. ISSN 1525-383X doi: 10.1108/MBR-06-2014-0026

Abstract/Summary

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address how firms adapt their product and geographic diversification as a response to foreign rivals penetrating their domestic market by adopting a behavioral perspective to understand firm-level strategic responses to foreign entry. Design/methodology/approach – The study proposes that strategic responses to foreign entry selected by domestic incumbents have both a framing component and a related, strategic choice component, with the latter including changes in product and geographic market diversification (though other more business strategy-related responses are also possible, e.g. in product pricing and marketing). This study tests a set of hypotheses building on panel data of large US firms. Findings – The study finds, in accordance with our predictions, that domestic incumbents reduce their product and geographic diversification when facing an increase in import penetration. However, when increased market penetration by foreign firms takes the form of FDI rather than imports, the corporate response appears to be an increase in product and geographic diversification, again in line with our predictions. Originality/value – The study develops a new conceptual framework that is grounded in prospect theory, but builds on recent insights from mainstream international strategic management studies (Bowen and Wiersema, 2005; Wiersema and Bowen, 2008).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/43928
Identification Number/DOI 10.1108/MBR-06-2014-0026
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Publisher Emerald
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar