Pereira, V. and Fontinha, R.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-098X
(2016)
An exploration of the role duality experienced by HR professionals as both implementers and recipients of HR practices: evidence from the Indian railways.
Human Resource Management, 55 (1).
pp. 127-142.
ISSN 1099-050X
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21717
Abstract/Summary
This study provides an innovative perspective on empirically assessing HR by focusing on the duality of HR professionals’ experiences as both implementers and recipients or internal customers of HR practices given that they are also employees of the organization. We hypothesize that HR professionals experience HR practices more favorably from an implementer perspective as compared to an internal customer perspective. These differences in experiences are likely to be influenced by HR professionals’ hierarchical position in the HR department. Our analyses of 1,271 HR professionals employed by Indian Railways revealed a number of differences between the two types of experience. Some practices (recruitment and selection, training, and employee welfare) were viewed more negatively from the implementer perspective, whereas others (compensation, benefits, and employment relations) were rated more negatively from the internal customer perspective. Those holding more senior HR positions reported more positive experiences of training and employment relations from an internal customer perspective. Overall our contributions draw on the attribution theory and concepts of intraorganizational power and voice, and have implications concerning the effectiveness of HR practices. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/41766 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1002/hrm.21717 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy |
| Uncontrolled Keywords | Indian Railways, assessment of HR practices, HR professionals, hierarchy, duality of roles, attribution theory, intraorganizational power |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download