More questions for mirror neurons

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Borg, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-9568 (2013) More questions for mirror neurons. Consciousness and Cognition, 22 (3). pp. 1122-1131. ISSN 1053-8100 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.013

Abstract/Summary

The mirror neuron system is widely held to provide direct access to the motor goals of others. This paper critically investigates this idea, focusing on the so-called ‘intentional worry’. I explore two answers to the intentional worry: first that the worry is premised on too limited an understanding of mirror neuron behaviour (Sections 2 and 3), second that the appeal made to mirror neurons can be refined in such a way as to avoid the worry (Section 4). I argue that the first response requires an account of the mechanism by which small-scale gestures are supposedly mapped to larger chains of actions but that none of the extant accounts of this mechanism are plausible. Section 4 then briefly examines refinements of the mirror neuron-mindreading hypothesis which avoid the intentional worry. I conclude that these refinements may well be plausible but that they undermine many of the claims standardly made for mirror neurons.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/31256
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.013
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Cognition Research (CCR)
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar